The college experience is a great time in everyone’s life,
for many of us it is a time to start living on our own, to gain new experiences
and to see what the rest of the world is like. It is also a time when most of
us are exposed to many points of view and not all of them are good or
truthful. College newspapers are a good
source of “new philosophy” and recently once such column was brought to my
attention.
The column was about the benefits of organic farming and the
evils of conventional agriculture. Right off let’s make one thing clear; I have
no problem with organic farming. All of us in the realm of agriculture are on
the same team and I am supportive of my organic counterparts. Producing food
and fiber is a tough job, no matter how you go about it and we all need to
stick together.
I do, however, take offense to those who directly attack
conventional agriculture. I do not know this writer’s background, I am fairly
certain they are not directly involved with farming or ranching and that they
get the majority of their information (if not all of it) from the internet. The
column was filled with bad theories, twisted assumptions and outright fiction
and it needed to be answered.
Right off the title of the article said organic farming was
more efficient and healthier. Let’s look at the efficiency part first. We all
know that the development of new technology like gmo crops have made us far
more efficient. Before the introduction of Round-up Ready crops we all spent more
time cultivating and weeding our crops. Prior to no-till many more passes were
made in preparation during planting season. We are far more efficient whether
we are talking about fuel, labor or any other input.
The author also asserts that the soil in an organic setting
is healthier. I whole heartedly disagree with this. No-till on our farm has
allowed us to build the organic matter back to levels that have not been seen
since the sod was broken. It does my heart good when I can see the remains of
the last two crops on the ground under this current crop. Because we are not
tilling the residue slows the rainfall down and we lose much less soil to
erosion.
The author also makes the assumption that organic farmers
are promoting a more environmentally sound method of agricultural production
because they rotate crops and do not promote a monoculture. We all know crop
rotation is something that bridges across all segments of crop production. We
have all learned that a diversified mix of crops is good not only in terms of
pest management but also for economic well-being. No one wants to put all of
their eggs into one basket.
Finally, the columnist alleges that organic food is
healthier for us to eat. No credible research has ever borne this out. I have
seen no peer reviewed, fact based articles stating that conventionally raised
food containing gmo crops pose any kind of a health risk. The only articles I
have seen stating there is a health risk are those on the internet from dubious
sources with no iron clad research to back them up.
What I saw in the Collegian’s column was the same inter-net
based rumors and outright lies that the author had extrapolated into a very
well written attack on conventional agriculture. The column went on to say that
all the food we need could be grown locally, even in cities. While this theory
is nice and may even work on paper, those of us in agriculture know that it
will not work.
The accusation was even made that modern agriculture was
somehow contributing to hunger and starvation. That is the most outright lie in
the whole mess. It is a well known fact that we need to increase production of
food significantly to meet the demand of a growing population and we need to
increase it on a curve steeper than the one we are on right now. I am sorry,
but this cannot be done in any other way than to increase and continue to
develop those technologies available to agriculture.
The bottom line is that the column highlights the misinformation
our next generation of consumers is being exposed to. We need to step in and
provide them with the facts and tell our story. If we stay silent more people
like this columnist will fill the void with sensational propaganda and
influence a whole generation of consumers. We must all be vigilant and take the
time and opportunities to dispel bad information with the truth. That truth is
that we are all proud producers, using the most up-to-date technologies to feed
an ever-growing world.
No comments:
Post a Comment